RPN-38 CX for PC

Software Features and Description

1. RPN-38 CX is the first photo-realistic simulation of Hewlett-Packard's popular high-end programmable business calculator HP-38C for the iPhone.

2. Produced from 1979 through 1983, it was the "Chive" member of the third-generation HP calculators known as the "Spice" series.

3. RPN-38 CX is fully compatible with the HP-12C, except for calculations and programs involving Bonds and Depreciation.

4. While the simulator works like the original calculator, a number of carefully designed extensions make it a lot easier to use.

5. Liked RPN-38 CX? here are 5 Productivity apps like Google Drive; Microsoft Outlook; Yahoo Mail - Organized Email; HP Smart; Microsoft Word;

GET Compatible PC App

App	Download	Rating	Maker
RPN-38 CX	Get App ↲	6 5.00	CuVee Software

Or follow the guide below to use on PC:

Select Windows version:

Install RPN-38 CX app on your Windows in 4 steps below:

Download an Android emulator for PC:
Get either Bluestacks or the Nox App >> . We recommend Bluestacks because you can easily find solutions online if you run into problems while using it. Download Bluestacks PC software Here >> .

Install the emulator:
On your computer, goto the Downloads folder » click to install Bluestacks.exe or Nox.exe » Accept the License Agreements » Follow the on-screen prompts to complete installation.

Open the Emulator app you installed » goto its search bar and search "RPN-38 CX"
The search will reveal the RPN-38 CX app icon. Open, then click "Install".
Once RPN-38 CX is downloaded inside the emulator, locate/click the "All apps" icon to access a page containing all your installed applications including RPN-38 CX.
Now enjoy RPN-38 CX on PC.

Download a Compatible APK for PC

Download	Developer	Rating	Current version
Get APK for PC →	CuVee Software	5.00	3.8

Get RPN-38 CX on Apple macOS

Download	Developer	Reviews	Rating
Get $1.99 on Mac	CuVee Software	6	5.00

Download on Android: Download Android

That is almost as good as original!

By aussie guy (Pcmac user)

I have not used this particular model, but others either side and you have captured the essence of the product and its efficiency. Have to look at the others now.